· 7/25/1969
Heisner v. Jones
Citations
- 169 N.W.2d 606
- 184 Neb. 602
- 1969 Neb. LEXIS 605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the insurer will not be bound unless given full notice and adequate opportunity to intervene and defend on all damages and liability issues
- holding the insurer will not be bound unless given full notice and adequate opportunity to intervene and defend on all damages and liability issues
- no difference exists between this situation and the common situation where a carrier has coverage on two insureds involved in the same accident
- no difference between this situation and the common situation where the carrier has coverage on two insureds involved in the same accident
- it is desirable to “avoid the multiplicity of suits and the harassment of the insured by the necessity to litigate his rights twice”
- no difference exists between this situation and the common situation where a carrier has coverage on two insureds involved in the same accident
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.