Skip to main content
· 7/25/1969

Heisner v. Jones

Citations

  • 169 N.W.2d 606
  • 184 Neb. 602
  • 1969 Neb. LEXIS 605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the insurer will not be bound unless given full notice and adequate opportunity to intervene and defend on all damages and liability issues
  • holding the insurer will not be bound unless given full notice and adequate opportunity to intervene and defend on all damages and liability issues
  • no difference exists between this situation and the common situation where a carrier has coverage on two insureds involved in the same accident
  • no difference between this situation and the common situation where the carrier has coverage on two insureds involved in the same accident
  • it is desirable to “avoid the multiplicity of suits and the harassment of the insured by the necessity to litigate his rights twice”
  • no difference exists between this situation and the common situation where a carrier has coverage on two insureds involved in the same accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.