Heiselt v. Heiselt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sole possession, payment of taxes and extensive improvements are not sufficient to show an intent to oust cotenants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Olwell v. Clark
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 28×
• Beckstrom v. Beckstrom
  Utah Supreme Court· 1978-04-14· cited 26×
• Walker v. Walker
  Utah Supreme Court· 1965-07-19· cited 19×
• Sweeney Land Co. v. Kimball
  Utah Supreme Court· 1990-02-09· cited 14×
• Holbrook v. Carter
  Utah Supreme Court· 1967-08-21· cited 9×
• Yin v. Midkiff
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1971-02-10· cited 8×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Utah Supreme Court· 1978-07-31· cited 7×
• Ryan v. Earl
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-09-26· cited 5×
• Massey v. Prothero
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 4×
• Gillmor v. Gillmor
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-12-19· cited 4×
• Hughes v. Yardley
  Utah Supreme Court· 1967-06-01· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Clotworthy v. Clyde
  Utah Supreme Court· 1954-01-08· cited 8×