Heis v. Allstate Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Feit, supra, Kopp, supra, and Masaki supra, in holding that the spouse of a Kaiser plan member treated at a Kaiser facility was entitled to medical payment benefits from the automobile insurer
• “the insurer is entitled to enough information to form a reasonable estimate of its liability”
• the predecessor to ORS 742.061(1) was intended “to encourage the settlement of claims and to discourage the unreasonable rejection of claims by insurers”
• insured, whose hospital expenses were paid by a group health plan, was “entitled to recover under her [medical payments] policy 16 with defendant without deducting the amount paid by the [group health plan] for her medical services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).