Skip to main content
· 6/10/1988

Heirs of Roberts v. Coal Processing

Citations

  • 369 S.E.2d 188
  • 235 Va. 556
  • 4 Va. Law Rep. 3068
  • 101 Oil & Gas Rep. 406
  • 1988 Va. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an indivisible contract “differs from those providing for payment in installments, due at specified times” for purposes of determining when statute of limitations commences
  • noting that “[i]n the case of an indivisible” contract, plaintiff “has the election of pursuing his remedy when the breach occurs, or of awaiting the time fixed by the contract for full and final performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.