Heirs of Herriman v. Janney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that unpublished decision cited by the defendant “is a summary decision issued by the [Massachusetts] Appeals Court pursuant to Rule 1:28 and consequently may be cited only for persuasive value, but not as binding precedent”
• “The evidence at issue in Hoteles Condado Beach was the only available evidence. Ameriprise does not seem to contend that this was the only evidence available to the Panel. Nor does Ameriprise contend that it was otherwise unable to put on its case.”
• “general allegations” were deemed insufficient to establish personal connection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).