Heirs of Curtis v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[w]hether information 11 constitutes a trade secret is a fact-intensive determination” (citing In re Providian Credit 12 Card Cases, 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 833 (Ct. App. 2002))
• noting that \justifiable reliance is a context-specific and fact-intensive inquiry\
• denying summary judgment 8 where company submitted evidence indicating it had spent over eighty hours 9 investigating the defendants’ unauthorized access to its computer systems
• “As a matter of law, ‘for convenience’ termination does not necessarily foreclose suit. . . . [The plaintiff] may assert breach of contract claims even after terminating for convenience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).