Heinzman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s maximum sentence on three counts of child molesting was not inappropriate given the heinous circumstances of the crimes even though defendant did not have any prior criminal history at the time he committed his crimes
• holding a child molestation victim’s statements in a letter to the defendant were admissible because they spoke to the child’s then-existing state of mind and emotions
• upholding three convictions of class C felony child molesting against double jeopardy challenge where evidence established at least four separate acts of molestation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).