Skip to main content
· 10/24/1910

Heinze v. United States

Citations

  • 218 U.S. 675
  • 31 S. Ct. 223
  • 54 L. Ed. 1205
  • 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If a decision is unduly delayed, a proceeding in mandamus may be instituted to compel a decision....”
  • a sixteen to twenty-three-month delay between the Public Service Commission’s hearing and its decision did not, by itself, justify overturning the PSC’s order
  • a sixteen to twenty-three-month delay between the Public Service Commission’s hearing and its decision did not, by itself, justify overturning the PSC’s order
  • “íf a decision is unduly delayed, a proceeding in mandamus may be instituted to compel a decision but not how to decide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.