· 10/24/1910
Heinze v. United States
Citations
- 218 U.S. 675
- 31 S. Ct. 223
- 54 L. Ed. 1205
- 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If a decision is unduly delayed, a proceeding in mandamus may be instituted to compel a decision....”
- a sixteen to twenty-three-month delay between the Public Service Commission’s hearing and its decision did not, by itself, justify overturning the PSC’s order
- a sixteen to twenty-three-month delay between the Public Service Commission’s hearing and its decision did not, by itself, justify overturning the PSC’s order
- “íf a decision is unduly delayed, a proceeding in mandamus may be instituted to compel a decision but not how to decide”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.