Skip to main content
· 5/5/1890

Heinz v. Brueckmann

Citations

  • 134 Pa. 495
  • 19 A. 674
  • 1890 Pa. LEXIS 731

Syllabus

<p>In a proceeding to enjoin the use of a specific label for bottled goods, the master having found that the label in use by the defendants was an imitation of that adopted by the plaintiffs by a prior use as their trademark, and that purchasers were liable to be deceived by such imitation, it was not error to confirm the report and award an injunction as recommended.</p>

Judges: Cueiam, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.