Heinz Kettler GMBH & Co. v. RAZOR USA, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the proposed transferee forum was inconvenient for the plaintiff because the plaintiffs “principal place of business, employees, and relevant documents are located in Virginia”
• “The inconvenience to these witnesses is accorded little weight in the transfer analysis because Kettler International has failed to provide specific details regarding how each witness’s testimony will be material and non-cumulative.”
• “The inconvenience to these witnesses, all of whom are either Razor’s employees, related to Razor’s employees, or Razor’s paid consultants, merits little weight in the transfer analysis because Razor has failed to show that compulsory process is needed to obtain their testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).