Heinz G. Dall v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court had discretion to consider tardy response when no prejudice was indicated
• concluding claims already addressed on direct appeal could not be raised in habeas petition
• “Claims which were raised and decided on direct appeal cannot be relitigated on a motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” (quoted source and internal marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).