Skip to main content
· 11/18/2011

Heintzman v. Amalgamated Transit Union International

Citations

  • 825 F. Supp. 2d 161
  • 192 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2077
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to remand where plaintiffs state law claims required interpretation of international union constitution
  • national officer's claim that union unlawfully withheld vacation pay in violation of constitution \falls within the bounds of Section 301(a)\
  • national officer’s claim that union unlawfully withheld vacation pay in violation of constitution “falls within the bounds of Section 301(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.