· 6/30/1931
Heinselman v. United States
Citations
- 51 F.2d 1078
- 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3060
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the juvenile court’s sanction for discovery violation of ORS 419B.881(9
- concluding that the juvenile court’s sanction for discovery violation of ORS 419B.881(9) was an abuse of discretion because the violation was not willful and the court failed to consider the interests of the children in excluding DHS’s evidence
- “[U]nder the plain language of the statute, i.e., the court ‘may,’ it is properly within the discretion of the juvenile court to determine the sanction, if any, to be imposed for breach of the duty to disclose.” (Emphasis omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.