· 12/3/1986
Heinrich v. Silvernail
Citations
- 500 N.E.2d 835
- 23 Mass. App. Ct. 218
- 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- decedent’s first and only will, leaving property to his former social worker, was not contrary to any prior disposition or stated intent
- beneficiary did not know that decedent had made will until after it was executed, and did not meet decedent’s lawyer until after decedent’s death
- decedent susceptible to undue influence given age, weakened physical condition, and total dependency on others
- niece not natural object of uncle's affection where there had been virtually no communication between them for years
- despite her assistance with decedent’s bank accounts, beneficiary had no discretion, as “[a]ll checks were drawn at his direction, solely to pay bills, and reviewed and signed by him”
- Power of influence normally held by one friend over another will not automatically defeat bequest; such influence is “a simple and expected consequence of human friendship and ... compassion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greaney, Quirico, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.