Skip to main content
· 12/3/1986

Heinrich v. Silvernail

Citations

  • 500 N.E.2d 835
  • 23 Mass. App. Ct. 218
  • 1986 Mass. App. LEXIS 1934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • decedent’s first and only will, leaving property to his former social worker, was not contrary to any prior disposition or stated intent
  • beneficiary did not know that decedent had made will until after it was executed, and did not meet decedent’s lawyer until after decedent’s death
  • decedent susceptible to undue influence given age, weakened physical condition, and total dependency on others
  • niece not natural object of uncle's affection where there had been virtually no communication between them for years
  • despite her assistance with decedent’s bank accounts, beneficiary had no discretion, as “[a]ll checks were drawn at his direction, solely to pay bills, and reviewed and signed by him”
  • Power of influence normally held by one friend over another will not automatically defeat bequest; such influence is “a simple and expected consequence of human friendship and ... compassion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greaney, Quirico, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.