Heinlen v. Beans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the city’s pension plan “created by the governing ordinances form[ed] a contract between the City and its employees”
• rejecting reliance on the city’s employee handbook to vary the terms of the pension plan created by ordinance, explaining that “[a] court cannot, under the guise of statutory construction, either revise or enlarge upon those clear provisions of the [p]lan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).