Skip to main content
· 5/27/1993

Heinig v. Hudman

Citations

  • 865 P.2d 110
  • 177 Ariz. 66
  • 139 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 48
  • 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court violated wife’s right to procedural due process by entering judgment against both spouses based on arbitration award entered after arbitration proceedings to which husband alone was a party
  • holding wife’s due process rights were violated when judgment against husband was converted to judgment against both husband and wife following proceeding at which wife was not a party
  • “[An] exception [to claim preclusion] applies when a court expressly reserves the plaintiff’s right to bring a second action.”
  • “A dismissal without prejudice does not go to the merits of the plaintiff’s cause and does not bar plaintiff from later filing on the same cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lankford, Gerber, Jacobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.