· 5/27/1993
Heinig v. Hudman
Citations
- 865 P.2d 110
- 177 Ariz. 66
- 139 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 48
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that court violated wife’s right to procedural due process by entering judgment against both spouses based on arbitration award entered after arbitration proceedings to which husband alone was a party
- holding wife’s due process rights were violated when judgment against husband was converted to judgment against both husband and wife following proceeding at which wife was not a party
- “[An] exception [to claim preclusion] applies when a court expressly reserves the plaintiff’s right to bring a second action.”
- “A dismissal without prejudice does not go to the merits of the plaintiff’s cause and does not bar plaintiff from later filing on the same cause of action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lankford, Gerber, Jacobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.