· 3/1/1984
Heinemann v. United States
Citations
- 4 Cl. Ct. 564
- 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 282
- 1984 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The opportunity [for] cross-examination is an essential safeguard of the accuracy and completeness of testimony, and it is a right and not a mere privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colaianni
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.