Skip to main content
· 3/1/1984

Heinemann v. United States

Citations

  • 4 Cl. Ct. 564
  • 223 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 282
  • 1984 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The opportunity [for] cross-examination is an essential safeguard of the accuracy and completeness of testimony, and it is a right and not a mere privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colaianni

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.