Skip to main content
· 7/7/1962

Hein v. Mills Building Co.

Citations

  • 372 P.2d 994
  • 190 Kan. 198
  • 1962 Kan. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where no competent substantial evidence was adduced to show when it had started to rain or how much dampness had accumulated on the floor of defendant’s building, defendant could not be charged with constructive notice of any dangerous condition
  • where no competent substantial evidence was adduced to show when it had started raining or how much dampness had accumulated on the floor of defendant’s building, defendant could not be charged with constructive notice of any dangerous condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.