Hein v. Hein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the respondent consented to termination of trust as beneficiary, while objecting in capacity as trustee
• noting comments to Restatement of Trusts § 338 indicate irrevocable spendthrift trust may be terminated when the settlor and the beneficiaries consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Neeley v. Neeley
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-01-21· cited 26×
• PLAINS COMMERCE BANK, INC. v. BECK
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-02-15· cited 3×
• IN RE: FREI IRREVOCABLE TRUST
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2017-03-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Hurlbutt
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-12-23· cited 14×
• Botzum v. Havana National Bank
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1937-12-22· cited 14×
• St. Louis Union Trust Company v. Conant
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1973-05-14· cited 13×
• In Re Edgar Estate
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-07-11· cited 13×
• Musick v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-10-25· cited 4×
• Ludlow's Trustee v. Ludlow
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-05-26· cited 2×