Skip to main content
· 5/31/1962

Hein v. Family Life Insurance

Citations

  • 376 P.2d 152
  • 60 Wash. 2d 91
  • 1962 Wash. LEXIS 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a claim based on fraudulent misrepresentation in the insurance application would be barred under the incontestability provision
  • illustrating that incontestability provisions exist to guard against fraudulent insurance applications by short-lived applicants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.