· 5/31/1962
Hein v. Family Life Insurance
Citations
- 376 P.2d 152
- 60 Wash. 2d 91
- 1962 Wash. LEXIS 275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a claim based on fraudulent misrepresentation in the insurance application would be barred under the incontestability provision
- illustrating that incontestability provisions exist to guard against fraudulent insurance applications by short-lived applicants
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.