Washington Supreme Court· 11/26/1954
Hein v. Chrysler Corp.
Citations
- 277 P.2d 708
- 45 Wash. 2d 586
- 1954 Wash. LEXIS 452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding employer not vicariously liable for employees malicious inducement of a breach of contract even though employees used employer’s business to induce breach because employees not acting within scope of employment
- \An employee who willfully and for his own purposes violates the property rights of another ... is not acting in the furtherance of his employer's business.\
- “An employee who willfully and for his own purposes violates the property rights of another ... is not acting in the furtherance of his employer’s business.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 230×
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court· 1964-10-29· cited 134×
- JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-02-25· cited 121×
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal· 1963-12-06· cited 118×
- Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1975-12-11· cited 112×
- Worrie v. BozeSupreme Court of Virginia· 1956-11-26· cited 100×
- Reninger v. State Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 98×
- Reninger v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 96×
- Scymanski v. DufaultWashington Supreme Court· 1971-12-16· cited 76×
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-01-18· cited 72×
- City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 71×
- Olympic Fish Products, Inc. v. LloydWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-22· cited 57×
- Kuehn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-17· cited 52×
- Daly v. NauIndiana Court of Appeals· 1975-12-31· cited 51×
- Worrick v. FloraAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-08-17· cited 40×
- Hickman v. Winston County Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-05-22· cited 38×
- Bratton v. CalkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-31· cited 21×
- Jassim Mohamed Thunayan Alghanim v. The Boeing CompanyNinth Circuit· 1973-03-09· cited 19×
- Olson v. ScholesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-25· cited 19×
- Malarkey Asphalt Co. v. WyborneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-12-18· cited 19×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1924-11-17· cited 293×
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 170×
- Matsuda v. HammondWashington Supreme Court· 1913-12-27· cited 29×
- H. D. Watts Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1929-06-05· cited 28×
- Chase v. KnabelWashington Supreme Court· 1907-06-22· cited 15×
- Gray v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1953-10-29· cited 10×
- Langness v. KetonenWashington Supreme Court· 1953-04-14· cited 8×
- Linck v. MathesonWashington Supreme Court· 1911-06-22· cited 7×
- Barnett v. Inland Motor FreightWashington Supreme Court· 1954-04-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.