Hein v. Chrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding employer not vicariously liable for employees malicious inducement of a breach of contract even though employees used employer’s business to induce breach because employees not acting within scope of employment
• \An employee who willfully and for his own purposes violates the property rights of another ... is not acting in the furtherance of his employer's business.\
• “An employee who willfully and for his own purposes violates the property rights of another ... is not acting in the furtherance of his employer’s business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).