Heilig v. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Mr. Heilig had standing because he was in fact affected by Game & Fish rules but that the declaratory judgment action did not serve a useful purpose
• concluding appellant facing criminal charges in circuit court was “adversely affected in fact” by Game & Fish rules because he was criminally cited and prosecuted in circuit court for violating those rules and, thus, had standing in parallel declaratory judgment action
• affirming dismissal of declaratory judgment action for failure to serve useful purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).