Heilig v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[t]he Legislature is presumed to have been aware of existing legislation at the time it adopted [the statute].”
• stating that Legislature is presumed to be aware of existing legislation at time statute is enacted
• stating that Legislature is presumed to be aware of existing legislation at time statute is enacted
• stating that the Legislature is presumed to be aware of legislation existing at the time that a statute is enacted
• noting that the Legislature is presumed to be aware of existing legislation at the time a statute is enacted
• noting that a repeal by implication requires “clear and compelling evidence of the legislative intent, and such intent must be free from reasonable doubt” and stating that “[e]very reasonable construction should be applied to avoid a finding of implied repealer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).