Skip to main content
· 9/16/2016

Heidi Corcoran Wener v. Erik Wener

Citations

  • 2016 VT 109
  • 203 Vt. 582
  • 157 A.3d 1108
  • 2016 Vt. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “remand for the court to change the restriction to limit use or possession of materials depicting ‘sexually explicit conduct’ as defined in RCW9.68A.011(4)”
  • Division Three opinion rejecting a similar condition as “improperly authorizing the community corrections officer to require plethysmograph testing” and remanding to clarify that such testing “should only be used at the direction of the sexual deviancy evaluator and/or treatment provider”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dooley, Skoglund, Robinson, Eaton, Tomasi, Supr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.