Heidenreich v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[s]pecific instances of sexual conduct are not probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness”
• stating that the only incriminating evidence, besides that erroneously admitted, came from the victim himself and a physician who concluded that the injury could have a number of causes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).