Heidbrink v. United Railways Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the party alleging the existence of a forgery must prove his case “with reasonable certainty” and stating that “[i]n civil cases a preponderance is all that is required”
• no Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).