Hegab v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that scienter for a § 78j(b) securities fraud conviction “embrac[es] intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud” (quotation marks omitted)
• “Liability for securities fraud requires proof that the defendant acted with scienter, which is defined as a mental state embracing intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud.”’
• “Where the misstatements are so obviously unimportant to a reasonable investor that reasonable minds could not differ on the question of their importance, we may find the misstatements immaterial as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).