Hefner v. Republic Indemnity Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting application of article 21.42 to policy “made and signed in California” by insured who is “a California resident,” even though underlying assault occurred in Texas and proceeds were sought by a Texas resident
• article 21.42 did not require application of Texas law to suit by third party beneficiary of insurance contract made and signed in California and payable to California resident when third party beneficiary was injured in Texas
• article 21.42 did not require application of Texas law to suit by third party beneficiary of insurance contract made and signed in California and payable to California resident when third party beneficiary was injured in Texas
• article 21.42 did not require application of Texas law to suit by third party beneficiary of insurance contract made and signed in California and payable to California resident when third party beneficiary was injured in Texas
• same result under the “most significant relationship” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).