Heffner v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deliberate indifference standard was proper to show a due process violation under the Fourteenth Amendment
• recognizing that the Court appoints counsel only in exceptional circumstances, which hinges, in part, on whether the plaintiff has a colorable claim
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does not authorize compulsory appointment of counsel in civil cases
• recognizing that the Court appoints counsel only in exceptional circumstances, which hinges, in part, on whether the plaintiff has a colorable claim
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does not authorize compulsory appointment of counsel
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does not authorize compulsory appointment of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).