Heffleman v. Pennington County
Citations
- 3 S.D. 162
- 52 N.W. 851
- 1892 S.D. LEXIS 53
Syllabus
<p>1. The effect of affixing the corporate seal to a contract Is the same as when an individual affixes his seal. It makes the instrument a specialty.</p> <p>2. Section 603, Comp. Laws, requires the seal of the county to be attached to every county warrant. This makes such warrant a “sealed instrument,” within the meaning of section 4849, Comp. Laws, providing that actions on “sealed instruments” shall be brought within 20 years.</p> <p>3. An ordinary county warrant on the general fund, regularly issued, constitutes a prima facie cause of action against the county, and an action may be brought directly on such warrant.</p> <p>4. Where such warrant is in form payable to bearer, its possession and presentation by plaintiff at the trial is prima facie evidence of plaintiff’s ownership, even though such ownership is denied In defendant’s answer.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>
Judges: Kellam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Landauer v. Sioux Falls Imp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1897-10-05· cited 18×
- Grimsrud Shoe Co. v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1908-03-07· cited 6×
- Custer County Bank v. Custer CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1904-07-13· cited 5×
- Kimm v. WoltersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-11-14· cited 5×
- Thomas Kane & Co. v. Hughes CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-01-24· cited 4×
- Rochford v. School Dist. No. 11South Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-12-29· cited 4×
- Condon v. City of Eureka SpringsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas· 1905-02-10· cited 2×
- Robinson v. Pierre Independent School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1929-02-02· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Clark v. Farmers' Woollen Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court· 1836-05-15· cited 30×
- Board of Commissioners v. DayIndiana Supreme Court· 1862-11-15· cited 18×
- Smeltzer v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1876-02-14· cited 15×
- Crudup v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1891-01-31· cited 14×
- People ex rel. Lawrence v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court· 1869-01-15· cited 13×
- Porter v. Androscoggin & Kennebec Rail RoadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1853-07-01· cited 12×
- Terry v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court· 1862-09-01· cited 12×
- Rogers v. BrightmanWisconsin Supreme Court· 1859-12-14· cited 11×
- Savage v. Supervisors of Crawford CountyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1859-12-14· cited 7×
- Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria v. James YoungSupreme Court· 1803-03-18· cited 6×
- Edinburg American Land & Mortgage Co. v. City of MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1891-02-21· cited 6×
- Benoist v. Inhabitants of CarondeletSupreme Court of Missouri· 1843-07-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.