Heffernan v. Capasso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that DHS provided evidence that the respondent’s criminal appeal had been dismissed
• noting that the circumstance-specific approach applies to determining whether the loss to the victim exceeds $10,000
• stating that the Board reviews for clear error the Immigration Judge’s factual finding that an alien can avoid harm by relocating
• confirming that, once the agency evaluates the nature of the offense of conviction, it may “consider all reliable information in determining whether the respondent's crime is particularly serious”
• explaining that fraud offenses fall within the ambit of a particularly serious crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).