Heffernan & Co. v. Hartford Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insurer’s duty to defend was triggered by answers to interrogatories because they put insurer “on notice that a claim for damage ... will probably be made”
• holding that insurer’s duty to defend was triggered by answers to interrogatories because they put insurer “on notice that a claim for damage . . . will probably be made”
• holding that attorneys’ fees can be awarded only from time duty to defend arose
• holding that answers to interrogatories filed in the underlying action, which put the insurer on notice that a complaint would probably be amended to state a covered claim, triggered a duty to defend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).