Hefferman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of the same unusual name with the same address in the same city for the same offense of selling liquor in the same judicial district was sufficient to establish identity
• holding that evidence of the same unusual name with the same address in the same city for the same offense of selling liquor in the same judicial district was sufficient to establish identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States of America Ex Rel. Anthony Scoleri v. William J. Banmiller, Warden, Eastern State Penitentiary
  Third Circuit· 1962-12-11· cited 76×
• United States v. Harry Weiler
  Third Circuit· 1967-11-03· cited 27×
• People v. Theodore
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-11-03· cited 26×
• Jenkins v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1958-11-24· cited 15×
• State v. Lawyer
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-09-15· cited 12×
• State v. Pantoja
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-02-26· cited 9×
• United States v. Allen
  E.D. Kentucky· 1957-01-21· cited 9×
• United States v. Yatsko
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1938-07-05· cited 3×
• Cupler v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1966-02-24· cited 3×