· 7/6/1935
Heffelfinger v. Scott
Citations
- 142 Kan. 395
- 47 P.2d 66
- 1935 Kan. LEXIS 351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a correct result that a trial court reached for a wrong reason
- “An appellant’s failure to properly address the merits of his assertion of error constitutes abandonment of the issue.”
- “Appellate review of unpreserved constitutional claims is for plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.”
- a defendant preserves a constitutional claim by “presenting [it] to the trial court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.