Skip to main content
· 7/6/1935

Heffelfinger v. Scott

Citations

  • 142 Kan. 395
  • 47 P.2d 66
  • 1935 Kan. LEXIS 351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a correct result that a trial court reached for a wrong reason
  • “An appellant’s failure to properly address the merits of his assertion of error constitutes abandonment of the issue.”
  • “Appellate review of unpreserved constitutional claims is for plain error affecting the defendant’s substantial rights.”
  • a defendant preserves a constitutional claim by “presenting [it] to the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.