Skip to main content
· 5/5/1993

Heeb v. Smith

Citations

  • 613 N.E.2d 416
  • 21 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1558
  • 1993 Ind. App. LEXIS 463
  • 1993 WL 138832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \literal truth is not required\ to defend a defamation claim and that \it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true\
  • noting that “literal truth is not required” to defend a defamation claim and that “it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true”
  • noting that “literal truth is not required” to defend a defamation claim and that “it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true”
  • noting that “literal truth is not required” to defend a defamation claim and that “it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true”
  • providing that issues not raised before the trial court in a summary judgment pleading cannot be argued for the first time on appeal and are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Baker, Barteau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.