· 5/5/1993
Heeb v. Smith
Citations
- 613 N.E.2d 416
- 21 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1558
- 1993 Ind. App. LEXIS 463
- 1993 WL 138832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \literal truth is not required\ to defend a defamation claim and that \it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true\
- noting that “literal truth is not required” to defend a defamation claim and that “it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true”
- noting that “literal truth is not required” to defend a defamation claim and that “it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true”
- noting that “literal truth is not required” to defend a defamation claim and that “it is sufficient if the statement is substantially true”
- providing that issues not raised before the trial court in a summary judgment pleading cannot be argued for the first time on appeal and are waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Baker, Barteau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.