Hedrick v. PPG Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ABCMR decision to separate officer was supported although the officer alleged that a personality conflict tainted his ratings, in part because the rater testified that there was no personality conflict
• refusing to overturn board decision unless forbidden factors were present in ratings process and adversely affected ratings
• explaining the NDRB’s finding that Plaintiff’s discharge “was proper and equitable at the time of discharge”
• noting military regulations “were designed specifically to give members of the military a useable administrative process by which to present their claims without the entanglements of an entire due process structure”
• “[S]er-vice members have no constitutional rights to remain on active duty, and their rights are defined by the applicable statutes and regulations.”
• “[Service members have no right to remain on active duty, and their rights are defined by the applicable statutes and regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).