Skip to main content
· 6/11/1998

Hedrick v. Pfeiffer

Citations

  • 10 F. Supp. 2d 1106
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8853
  • 1998 WL 310131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “gross profit” is “revenues minus 11 cost of goods sold”
  • allowing a dispositive motion after complaint had 11 passed the court’s screening process and was served upon defendants.
  • because city personnel acted pursuant to a noticed hearing and city council resolution, and plaintiff failed to make any showing of unreasonable behavior, there was no Fourth Amendment violation when property was seized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kopf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.