· 6/11/1998
Hedrick v. Pfeiffer
Citations
- 10 F. Supp. 2d 1106
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8853
- 1998 WL 310131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “gross profit” is “revenues minus 11 cost of goods sold”
- allowing a dispositive motion after complaint had 11 passed the court’s screening process and was served upon defendants.
- because city personnel acted pursuant to a noticed hearing and city council resolution, and plaintiff failed to make any showing of unreasonable behavior, there was no Fourth Amendment violation when property was seized
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kopf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.