Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/30/2004

Hedrick-Koroll v. Bagley

Citations

  • 816 N.E.2d 849
  • 352 Ill. App. 3d 590
  • 287 Ill. Dec. 882
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing expired order under “public interest” exception to mootness doctrine in case wherein trial court failed to make statutorily required factual findings
  • stating that “moot issues may be reviewed under [the] public interest exception when there is a substantial public or private question involved, an authoritative determination is required for future guidance, and the issue is likely to recur”
  • remanding matter for trial court to set forth the findings mandated by section 214(c) of the Act
  • collecting cases: “The failure to make the required findings is reversible error.”
  • “because the plenary order of protection expired on January 1, 2004, the issues respondent raises on appeal are 4 moot.”
  • case remanded with instructions where, in extending plenary order of protection, trial court failed to make findings in “an official record or writing” as required by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callum, McLaren, Hutchinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hedrick-Koroll v. Bagley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.