Skip to main content
· 10/5/1956

Hedlund v. Davis

Citations

  • 47 Cal. 2d 75
  • 301 P.2d 843
  • 1956 Cal. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to construe “next general election” to refer to the election where the office is ordinarily filled because doing so “would render meaningless the [charter’s] words ‘for the unexpired term’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.