Skip to main content
· 2/5/1894

Hedden v. Robertson

Citations

  • 151 U.S. 520
  • 14 S. Ct. 434
  • 38 L. Ed. 257
  • 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2076

Syllabus

<p>Woven cotton clotli, tlie groundwork. of which was uniform, and upon which were figures or patterns, woven into it by means -of a Jacquard attachment contemporaneously with the weaving of the fabric, and which was known as Madras mull, being imported into the United States in 1886; became subject to the specific duties imposed by Schedule I (paragraphs 318, 320, 321 in the customs enumeration) of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, .c. 121, 22 Stat. 488, estimated by the number of threads to the squaie inch, and not to the.ad valorem, duty imposed by the same schedule on manufactures of cotton n,oi specially, enumerated.</p>

Judges: Jackson, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.