Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hospital could not be held strictly liable for furnishing an allegedly defective pacemaker, since the hospital was not a seller of pacemakers [product], but a provider of services
• holding that implanting a defective pacemaker was a service despite the device's defect
• hospital was not product seller of pace- maker but provider of medical services
• strict liability not applied to hospital for defective pacemaker
• strict liability not applied to hospital for defective pacemaker
• hospital not strictly liable for defective pacemaker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).