Hector Mancilla-Delafuente v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing “the elements of the state offense with those of the generic definition of a CIMT to determine if there is a categorical match”
• interpretating the petty offense exception to CIMT in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii
• “There are two types of possible CIMTs: those involving fraud and those involving grave acts of baseness or depravity.” (internal quotation omitted)
• alien not entitled to the petty offense exception where the conviction is also covered by 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)®
• a crime of moral turpitude was not entitled to petty offense exception of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii), where the conviction was potentially punishable by one year imprisonment, and was covered by § 1227(a)(2)(A)®
• a crime of moral turpitude was not entitled to petty offense exception of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii), where the conviction was potentially punishable by one year imprisonment, and was covered by 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).