Hecsomar Realty Corp. v. Camarena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider an argument that a trial court should have given an unrequested limiting instruction on the use of admitted ER 404(b) evidence
• appellate court implied finding where record showed that trial court had actually made it, even though trial court had not explicitly stated that it was making finding
• Under the law of the case doctrine, our decision is binding on further proceedings in the trial court on remand
• appellate court implied finding where record showed that trial court had actually made it, even though trial court had not explicitly stated that it was making finding
• court declined to advise jury that defendant had earlier been acquitted of certain crimes because fairness would require it to advise jury about aspects of the prior trial that would not be helpful to the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).