Hecksher v. Edenborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 28 the boilerplate suggests a “more rigorous” standard than the regulation
• finding that the plaintiff’s daily activities did not “display a routine compatible with maintaining a schedule required of work” and that there was “not even a thread of logic [ ], let alone a bridge” in the ALJ’s discussion otherwise
• stating that the “not entirely consistent” language was “yet another example of the continuous, confusing and meaningless boilerplate that is all too common in these decisions and that stubbornly persists in spite of the efforts of the Court of Appeals”
• finding claimant’s statements “not entirely consistent” with other evidence is a more rigorous standard than called for in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529
• expressing concern that the same boilerplate language may indicate the ALJ was applying the wrong evidentiary standard
• expressing concern that the same boilerplate language may indicate the ALJ was applying the wrong evidentiary standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).