Heck v. Board of Trustees, Kenyon College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “consolidation under Rule 42(a) was improper” where one “case was not properly removed and pending before this court prior to consolidation”
• finding that “consolidation under Rule 42(a) was improper” where one “case was not properly removed and pending before this court prior to consolidation”
• noting that an employee’s past positive evaluations do not discredit the employer’s proffered reasons for termination because it is the employee’s performance at the time of termination which is relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).