Heck v. Archer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[u]ndue influence is a species of fraud” and that “[f]raud is never presumed but must be shown by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence,” even in regard to testamentary transfers
• noting that there is no “laundiy list or exact definition” of suspicious circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).