· 5/7/1996
Heck Implement, Inc. v. Deere & Co.
Citations
- 926 F. Supp. 138
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6572
- 1996 WL 257260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- enjoining supplier from terminating dealership agreement and asserting “[i]n [the court’s] judgment, likely harm to [the plaintiff] from loss of the dealership greatly outweighs any likely harm to [the defendant] from continuing the dealership for a hypothetical six months”
- enjoining supplier from terminating dealership agreement and asserting “[i]n [the court’s] judgment, likely harm to [the plaintiff] from loss of the dealership greatly outweighs any likely harm to [the defendant] from continuing the dealership for a hypothetical six months”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sachs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.