Hecht v. Automatic Instrument Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding employer was bound by unsigned CBAs where there was sufficient evidence that employer manifested intent to adopt CBAs
• calling payment of union wages and contributions to welfare funds “sufficient, absent contrary evidence, to establish as a matter of law [employer’s] intent to adopt the two unsigned CBAs”
• “[A]n unsigned, written agreement satisfies Section 302(c)(5)(B)’s ‘written agreement’ requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).