Hebert v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The United States is a sovereign, and, as such, is immune from suit unless it has expressly waived such immunity and consented to be sued.”
• “The United States is a sovereign, and, as such, is immune from suit unless it has expressly waived such immunity and consented to be sued.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lopez ex rel. Estate of Rivas Parada v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-12-21· cited 9×
• Loya v. Gutierrez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-11-13· cited 4×
• Barraza v. United States
  W.D. Texas· 2007-07-24· cited 2×
• Hebert v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2006-01-26
• Loya v. Gutierrez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-02-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 3,342×
• Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
  Supreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 496×
• Linkous v. USA
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 93×
• Dry v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-12-19· cited 70×
• Laura Sue Durrenberger Smith, and Martha Durrenberger McKnight Plaintiffs v. Gary Booth, District Director, I.R.S., and the United States of America
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 25×