Hebert v. Taco Bell Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[i]t simply isn’t reasonable to hold Taco Bell responsible for the safety of persons who may have been a patron at one time, where injury is caused by the intentional acts of others inflicted off the premises”
• printout of complaint records from NOPD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).